And so, CNN ran an article on her and the dislike, people seem to have of her.
Rather unfair, given that HC has walked the talk for years.
Personally, I feel that she deserves to be nominated - and it's not because I am a woman.
I do not keep many female close friends, because most are too emotional for my taste and tend to omit the use of HEAD decisions.
BUT for HC, I would say, she is a strong woman, and because she is strong - women find her 'intimidating' ; men find her 'over-extending their idea of what a woman should be'.
Americans should be proud, that they have someone at their helm, who can feel, when it is required of her to feel and to cut the BS and get the job done.
When I was having a meal discussion topic about HC, it brought to mind Margaret Thatcher. The world labelled her as the woman who ruled with the iron fist.
These are 2 very different women, yet they are the few of this gender, who are able to lead a party of men in governance.
Some people say, she lies - IF she does, it's not something new for politicians - Politicians may not come out right to lie, but they don't always tell the whole truth. They say what is politically correct to say, at that point in time. Male or Female, ALL POLITICIANS are subject to the same expectation from the government. If the ruling party isn't ready to release some information, they are not ready. When the public compels them to cough something out, then it's when we hear/read partial truths/partial lies.
That doesn't make Hilary unworthy to be nominated.
Voters should grow up. Before judging anyone, put oneself in that person's shoes, THINK HARD (if you can) and vote for someone who is not going to take a box of tissue paper so they can cry into it.
The world is becoming a nasty place. Getting all EMO isn't going to provide us all WORLD PEACE.
Rather unfair, given that HC has walked the talk for years.
Personally, I feel that she deserves to be nominated - and it's not because I am a woman.
I do not keep many female close friends, because most are too emotional for my taste and tend to omit the use of HEAD decisions.
BUT for HC, I would say, she is a strong woman, and because she is strong - women find her 'intimidating' ; men find her 'over-extending their idea of what a woman should be'.
Americans should be proud, that they have someone at their helm, who can feel, when it is required of her to feel and to cut the BS and get the job done.
When I was having a meal discussion topic about HC, it brought to mind Margaret Thatcher. The world labelled her as the woman who ruled with the iron fist.
These are 2 very different women, yet they are the few of this gender, who are able to lead a party of men in governance.
Some people say, she lies - IF she does, it's not something new for politicians - Politicians may not come out right to lie, but they don't always tell the whole truth. They say what is politically correct to say, at that point in time. Male or Female, ALL POLITICIANS are subject to the same expectation from the government. If the ruling party isn't ready to release some information, they are not ready. When the public compels them to cough something out, then it's when we hear/read partial truths/partial lies.
That doesn't make Hilary unworthy to be nominated.
Voters should grow up. Before judging anyone, put oneself in that person's shoes, THINK HARD (if you can) and vote for someone who is not going to take a box of tissue paper so they can cry into it.
The world is becoming a nasty place. Getting all EMO isn't going to provide us all WORLD PEACE.
No comments:
Post a Comment